Chattanooga, 1906: One Lynching, Six Convictions, Ninety Days
The film of this episode premieres October 15, 2026 on YouTube. The documents, the transcript and the sources are below now.
On the night of March 19, 1906, a mob took Ed Johnson out of the Hamilton County jail in Chattanooga, Tennessee, carried him about six blocks to the county bridge over the Tennessee River, and killed him. The engineers' survey calls that bridge the Walnut Street Bridge; it was finished in 1891 and it is still standing.
Transcript
The bridge

R01
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1907 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
The Supreme Court tried six men for a killing at this bridge. It convicted them of contempt of court.

P01
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1907 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
The man they killed was named Ed Johnson, and his appeal was already docketed in Washington when they did it.
So the Attorney General of the United States filed an information in contempt against the sheriff of Hamilton County, Tennessee, and twenty-six other men.
Six of them were found guilty, and the heaviest sentence was ninety days.
Eighteen of the twenty-seven were dismissed before the hearing. Nine were tried. The six convicted were the sheriff, his night jailer, and four men from the mob.
Ninety days is the longest punishment anywhere in this record, and the Court was not punishing the killing. It could only reach the part that was aimed at itself.
Chattanooga

R11
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1902 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
Chattanooga sits on a bend of the Tennessee River under Lookout Mountain, in the southeast corner of the state.

R03
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1907 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
These photographs were made by the Detroit Publishing Company, most of them in nineteen-oh-seven. The year after all this happened.

R04
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1907 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
The colours are a machine's estimate. The originals are black-and-white glass negatives, and they are free at the Library of Congress.

R05
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1907 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
This is one of the avenues going out of town. A stone wall along the sidewalk. Big porches raised up above it.

R09
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1900-1920 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
A manufacturing district spreading along the water.
Two daily papers served the city. The Times in the morning, The News in the evening, both with a large circulation.

R08
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1905-1915 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
Hold on to those two papers. They do more work in this story than any lawyer does.
January
On the twenty-third of January, nineteen-oh-six, a white woman was raped in or near Chattanooga.

R14
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1902 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
Two days later Sheriff Joseph Shipp and his deputies arrested a Black man named Ed Johnson and charged him with it.
That same afternoon a judge ordered him taken out of the county. First to Dayton, then to Nashville. The finding on why runs to eight words. Because of fear that he would be lynched.
That night a large mob attacked the jail where he was supposed to be.

R13
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1900 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
Three deputies were there. The police came, and so did the chairman of the city's safety committee. They held them off.
The mob appointed a committee to walk through the jail and satisfy itself he was not in it. Even after that committee reported back, it took force to clear the yard.

R16
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1902 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
The militia was called out twice in those weeks. The county bought guns to defend the jail.
Johnson was brought back on the sixth of February and put on trial the same day. On the ninth he was convicted and sentenced to death.
The appeal that was not taken
Three lawyers had been appointed to defend him. They did not appeal.

R10
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1902 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
One of them published a statement in the Chattanooga Times explaining why, and the Supreme Court copied it into the record. It is the strangest thing in the case.
He had asked the judge to appoint three more lawyers to share the responsibility. Six of them sat down together and discussed the recent mob uprising and the state of unrest in the community.

R12
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1902 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
Their judgment was that the life of the defendant, even if the wrong man, could not be saved.
He must die by the judgment of the law. Or else, if his case were appealed, he would die by the act of the uprising of the people.
They explained the right of appeal to him. They also told him they feared an appeal would cause mob violence against him.
He said he did not want to die by a mob, and that he would do as they thought best.
The same lawyer ended his statement by begging every peace officer in the county to keep looking for further light on whether the man was guilty at all.

R17
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1900-1915 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
The execution was set for the thirteenth of March. The governor moved it to the twentieth.
What the petition said
On the third of March, two other lawyers went to the federal court instead and filed a petition for habeas corpus. It said every Black citizen had been excluded, illegally, from the grand jury and from the trial jury.
That his counsel had been deterred from raising it. Deterred from asking for a change of venue. Deterred from asking for a delay to let the excitement subside.

R15
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1900-1920 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
Deterred, the petition said, by the fear and danger of mob violence.
On the sixteenth the Chattanooga Times told its readers that a Black attorney had gone to Washington to get an appeal.

R07
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1905-1915 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
The record never gives his name.
On the tenth of March the federal circuit court turned the petition down. But it ordered Johnson held for ten days, so that he could appeal.
The order from Washington
On Saturday the seventeenth the appeal was presented in Washington to Justice John Marshall Harlan, a Kentuckian, who allowed it that day.
On Monday the nineteenth the full Court allowed the appeal, ordered all proceedings stayed, and the clerk wired the sheriff of Hamilton County.
Justice Harlan sent a second telegram, to the federal judge in Chattanooga, with the statute attached.
The statute said that while the appeal was pending, any state proceeding against the prisoner was null and void.
At about two o'clock the judge who had tried Johnson told Shipp face to face that the case was stayed, and that Johnson was now a federal prisoner.
Shipp understood that. The finding says so in six words.
At four o'clock The News put it on the street under a headline. An appeal is allowed. Ed Johnson will not hang to-morrow.
The story under it began: the gallows in the Hamilton County jail has again been disappointed.
The same paper ran an editorial that evening. All of this delay is aggravating to the community.
The nineteenth
The jail was four storeys, two of them below ground. An iron door, then a stair, then a revolving steel door, then the cell.
Sometime that evening the only other prisoner on the top floor, a white man, was moved off it. He had been moved the same way on the night of the first attempt.
Around half past eight, men walked in and went straight to the door of Johnson's corridor. It took them over an hour, with a sledge and an ax, to break the bolts on it.
About twelve men did the work. A crowd gathered to watch them do it.
The Court counted the guns in that mob. One rifle, in the jail office. One pistol, shown to a reporter.
The jail's own rifles, bought two months earlier for exactly this, were in a show case in that office. The mob took them out and unloaded them.
The militia was drilling in the armory three blocks away, between eight and half past ten. Nobody called them.
No alarm bell was rung at the court house.

P02
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1907 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
It had been rung on the night of the twenty-fifth of January, and it had brought a big crowd out.
In January the chairman of the board of safety had walked four or five blocks to the jail and picked up sixteen men on the way to put the mob down.
Nobody walked anywhere on the nineteenth. Asked afterwards to go and identify the men, the sheriff said it would be dangerous and foolish.
Six blocks
Johnson was brought out a little after ten, with his arms tied.
They took him to the county bridge over the Tennessee River. The Court measured the distance from the jail. About six blocks.

P04
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1907 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
The engineers' survey calls that bridge the Walnut Street Bridge. It was finished in eighteen ninety-one, and it is still standing.
Beyond an arc light, they put a rope around his neck and threw it over a beam. About ten minutes passed between the mob reaching the bridge and Ed Johnson being dead.
The Court's own words for it. A dangerous portion of the community, seized with the awful thirst for blood which only killing can quench.
They were so impatient for his blood, it said, that they utterly disregarded the act of Congress as well as the order of this court.
What the sheriff said
Two months later, at a meeting in Birmingham, Alabama, Shipp gave an interview to a reporter from the Age-Herald. It ran the next morning, and it convicted him.
I am frank to say that I did not attempt to hurt any of them, and would not have made such an attempt if I could.
He said the Supreme Court of the United States was responsible for this lynching. He said he had looked for no trouble that night. He had looked for it, he said, the next day.
The Court read all that as a man who resented its order as an alien intrusion.
And there is one more line in the findings. Shipp was standing for re-election, and he had been told that saving the prisoner in January would cost him his place.
He answered that he wished the mob had got him before he did.
What the Court found
The Court held that the riot was the direct result of opposition to the administration of the law by this court, and was understood to be.
Its finding against the sheriff is one sentence long. Shipp not only made the work of the mob easy, but in effect aided and abetted it.
The night jailer fell under the same condemnation, under less responsibility.
Three of the nine were cleared. A deputy named Galloway, and two men named Justice and Ward, because the evidence against them was not enough.
And then the reason the Court gave for being in this at all. If the life of any one in the custody of the law is at the mercy of a mob, the administration of justice becomes a mockery.
Rule discharged as to Galloway, Justice and Ward. Made absolute as to Shipp, Gibson, Williams, Nolan, Padgett and Mayse.
The dissent
Three justices dissented, and their first paragraph is the most important thing in the case.
Justice Peckham wrote that everyone who knew the facts agreed it was murder, without one extenuating circumstance to relieve its atrocious character.
And then, in the very next sentence: the important question, however, is whether the sheriff is guilty of the charge made against him in this proceeding.
That is the shape of the whole thing, written down by the men who lost the vote. Every justice on that bench believed a murder had been done. The only question in front of them was contempt.
Peckham found no evidence of any conspiracy, and no man in Chattanooga standing better as a citizen than Shipp.
He would have discharged the rule against the sheriff, and against the jailer too.
Ninety days
On the fifteenth of November, nineteen-oh-nine, six men stood at the bar of the Supreme Court of the United States.
The Chief Justice said the Court need not dwell on what it would mean to let this pass into a precedent for unpunished contempt.
Shipp, Williams and Nolan, ninety days. Gibson, Padgett and Mayes, sixty days. In the jail of the District of Columbia.
Two days later the marshal filed a return that the judgment had been executed according to the tenor thereof. That is the last line of the case.
Number two on the docket
There is one more entry, a few pages later in the same volume. Ed Johnson against the State of Tennessee. Number two. Docketed the nineteenth of March, nineteen-oh-six.
Case abated on account of death of appellant. On that day, the report says, the appellant was killed.
The Court had already said what it thought of that appeal. Writing in nineteen-oh-six, Justice Holmes said its grounds could not be regarded as frivolous, or a mere pretence.
The facts that might have been found, he wrote, would have required the gravest and most anxious consideration before the petition could have been denied.
And then, flatly, in the United States Reports. The murder of the petitioner has made it impossible to decide that case.
What the record does not contain
Nobody in these volumes is charged with that murder.
The Court was careful about why. It is not a party, Holmes wrote. There is nothing that affects the judges in their own persons.

R19
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1900 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
Their concern was only that the law should be obeyed. A killing in Chattanooga belonged to Tennessee, and Tennessee is not in these books.
The record names one lawyer for Ed Johnson on that appeal. E. M. Hewlett, of Washington.

R18
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1902 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
The two Chattanooga papers the Court quotes have never been digitised. Their words survive because a federal reporter typed them into a book.

R02
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1907 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
In February of two thousand, ninety-four years on, the Criminal Court of Hamilton County heard the case again and set the conviction aside. That is outside these four opinions, and it is the only part of this that anybody went back and fixed.

R01
Detroit Publishing Co., c. 1907 · Library of Congress · AI-colorized. View the original.
Everything you have seen is four opinions on one shelf in any law library, and all of it is free online. The citations are in the description. If you read one thing, read the dissent — it is where the law says out loud what it could not do.
Sources
- [S1] *United States v. Shipp*, 214 U.S. 386 (1909) — findings of fact and judgment (Fuller, C.J.); dissent of Peckham, White and McKenna, JJ. at 426; 46-page appendix. Library of Congress scan. https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep214386/
- [S2] *United States v. Shipp*, 203 U.S. 563 (1906) — Holmes, J., on jurisdiction, decided December 24, 1906. https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep203563/
- [S3] *United States v. Shipp*, 215 U.S. 580 (1909) — the sentence, pronounced November 15, 1909. https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep215percuriam/
- [S4] *Johnson v. Tennessee*, 214 U.S. 485 (1909) — No. 2, docketed March 19, 1906; abated May 24, 1909. https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep214485/
- [S5] Detroit Publishing Company photographs of Chattanooga, 1902–1907, Library of Congress — public domain, colorized here by machine. https://www.loc.gov/pictures/search/?q=Chattanooga&co=det
- [S6] Federal Judicial Center, Biographical Directory of Article III Federal Judges — John Marshall Harlan. https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/harlan-john-marshall
- [S7] Historic American Engineering Record, HAER TN-11 — Walnut Street Bridge, Chattanooga. https://www.loc.gov/pictures/collection/hh/item/tn0195/
- [S8] U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, *CONNECTIONS* — the Ed Johnson case and the 2000 exoneration hearing. https://connections.ca6.uscourts.gov/ed-johnson-case
- The reporter gives two dates for the conviction. The statement of facts at 214 U.S. 407 says "February 9 he was convicted and sentenced to death." The syllabus at 386 and Holmes's 1906 opinion at 203 U.S. 571 both say February 11. The episode uses February 9 — the findings of fact, made on evidence taken under the Court's own direction. The discrepancy is in the printed reports, not in this transcription.
- The reporter spells one defendant two ways. "Mayse" throughout 214 U.S.; "Mayes" in the sentence at 215 U.S. 581–582. Both appear on screen because both are on the page.
- Period language. The opinions say "negro" and "Negroes". The narration says "Black". The document images are primary sources and are unaltered.
- OCR errors the crops are anchored on. p. 414 prints "arc light"; the OCR reads "are light". p. 410 prints "Ed Johnson"; the OCR reads "Eid Johnson". p. 571 prints "deterred"; the OCR reads "deterréd". The bounding boxes are still correct, which is why the anchors are spelled the OCR's way.
- Page numbers were fixed by reading the running head off the page image at four spread points per volume, because the OCR misreads folios as numerals (394 as "894", 572 as "872", 437 as "487").
- A bug in `locate.py`, fixed here. U.S. Reports separates elided passages with rows of asterisks. `norm("*")` is the empty string, and the matcher's `tk.startswith(w)` test is true for every anchor token against an empty word — so a row of stars matched *any* phrase, and three plates silently resolved to the wrong region of the right page. `checkboxes.py` caught it by reading the OCR text back out of each resolved box. The same bug is in the copies of `locate.py` under `research/silver-bridge/` and `research/buffalo-creek-1972/`.
- What is not here. The Chattanooga Times and the Chattanooga News are not in Chronicling America or any other free archive; every word of them in this video is quoted from the Supreme Court's own reprinting. No photograph of Ed Johnson, of the jail, or of the night of March 19 is used, and no crime-scene imagery of any kind appears.